Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashé Journal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Ashé Journal

Ashé Journal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, has not been discussed to a sufficient extent in independent reliable sources, in fact, barely mentioned at all. Earlier versions were solely spam- the spam may be cut down now but it's still not notable/mentioned in the press or other publications enough.[1][2]. The only news coverage is reviews of two other books, not Ashe itself, which happen to mention it in parts of the reviews which we cannot see. [3] . Only two scholarly works seemingly independent of Ashe mention it, for the one we can see it's solely as the whereabouts of a cite.[4]. Sticky Parkin 11:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

• Delete as expected only LC has a copy. DGG (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.